Free Tool · EN 1997-1 §7 · Solar Farm Piles · Driven H-pile · DA1/DA2/DA3

Pile Foundation Bearing Capacity

Solar-farm driven pile design per EN 1997-1 §7 (DA1/DA2/DA3). Axial compression (α/β-method or CPT Bustamante-Gianeselli), wind uplift tension, Broms lateral, and Converse-Labarre group efficiency.

Design Code
Pile Geometry
W6×9: use 150mm equiv
8ft = 2.44m typical
Soil Profile
From (m)
To (m)
Soil type
φ' (°)
c_u (kPa)
γ (kN/m³)
qc (MPa)
Applied Loads
Wind uplift (PV trackers)
PV rack height above ground
Pile Group (optional)
Compression N_Ed / R_c,d PASS 81.8%
R_s,k shaft14.8 kN
R_b,k base7.2 kN
R_c,k char.22 kN
R_c,d design22 kN
N_Ed applied18 kN
Code refEN 1997-1:2004 §7.6 (DA2)
Uplift T_Ed / R_t,d FAIL 157.9%
R_t,k8.7 kN
R_t,d7.6 kN
T_Ed12 kN
Code refEN 1997-1:2004 §7.5 (DA2)
Lateral H_Ed / H_u,d PASS 23.3%
H_u,d12.9 kN
H_Ed3 kN
MethodBroms cohesionless
L/D16.27
Code refBroms (1964) — Short Rigid Pile
Export calculation report
Enter email to receive a formatted pile capacity report with code references.

Full site foundation analysis?

FrameAI Pro runs full foundation design + IFC export across the entire pile schedule in one upload.

Try the /demo →

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are driven H-piles used for solar farms?
Driven steel H-piles (W6×9, W8×31, or C-section) dominate ground-mount PV because they can be installed without excavation or concrete, achieving cycle times of < 2 min per pile. They offer high axial capacity in sand and excellent pullout resistance — critical under wind uplift loads from PV trackers.
How does EN 1997-1 DA2 differ from DA1 for pile design?
DA2 applies resistance factors directly to calculated pile resistances (γ_b, γ_s, γ_t) and uses unfactored ground parameters. DA1 uses two combinations: Comb1 factors loads; Comb2 factors ground parameters (γ_φ=1.25, γ_c=1.25). For driven piles γ_b=γ_s=γ_t=1.0 in both. DA3 factors both loads and ground strength — strictest approach.
What tension reduction factor should I use for uplift?
EN 1997-1 §7.5 does not prescribe a single factor; practice ranges from 0.70 to 0.90. For driven H-piles in sand, use 0.80 (conservative β-method under reversed loading). In cohesive soils the α-factor drops from 0.50 to 0.35 for tension (Tomlinson). Always verify with pile load tests on site.
When does the Broms method apply for laterally loaded piles?
Broms (1964) applies to short rigid piles where L/D < 20 (cohesionless) or L/D < 15 (cohesive). PV driven piles with 8ft (2.44m) embedment and 6in equiv dia have L/D ≈ 16 — borderline short. For longer piles use p-y curves (API RP 2GEO or LPILE). Broms gives a quick conservative estimate suitable for preliminary design.
What is the Converse-Labarre group efficiency formula?
η = 1 − (θ°/90) · [(n−1)m + (m−1)n] / (n·m), where θ = arctan(D/s), n = rows, m = cols, s = spacing. PV foundations typically use 1×2 or 2×2 groups at s ≥ 5D — giving η ≥ 0.95 and negligible group effect. Closer spacing in weak soils requires full group analysis.
Do solar farm piles need a full geotechnical investigation?
Yes. EN 1997-1 §3 requires geotechnical category assignment. Utility-scale solar (>1 MW) typically falls in GC2. A minimum investigation includes SPT or CPT at 100–200m grid spacing across the site. Pile design based on SPT correlation or CPT (Bustamante-Gianeselli) without load tests requires a model factor ξ applied to the characteristic resistance.